International Journal of Modern Engineering and Management

Mechanical, Water Absorption, and Thermal Characterisation of Jute–Sisal Hybrid Natural Fibre Reinforced Epoxy Composites

Author(s):

Anupam Srivastava, Kavitha Nair, Deepak Rajan Mishra

Affiliation: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India

Page No: 90-97-

Volume issue & Publishing Year: Volume 3, Issue 5, 2026/05/22

Journal: International Journal of Modern Engineering and Management | IJMEM

ISSN NO: 3048-8230

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20430703

Download PDF Cite this article

Abstract:

Natural fibre reinforced polymer (NFRP) composites have gained accelerating research attention as sustainable, lightweight alternatives to glass and carbon fibre reinforced plastics in semi-structural applications including automotive interior panels, agricultural equipment housings, and low-cost construction components, driven by growing regulatory and consumer pressure to reduce lifecycle environmental impact in the manufacturing sector. Jute (Corchorus capsularis) and sisal (Agave sisalana) are two of the most abundantly available bast and leaf natural fibres in India, with annual production of approximately 1.8 million tonnes and 0.3 million tonnes respectively, and their epoxy-matrix composites have individually attracted substantial research interest. However, systematic comparative data on hybrid laminates combining both fibre types under varying fibre volume fractions and surface chemical treatments, evaluated across the full spectrum of structural (tensile, flexural, impact, interlaminar shear), environmental (water absorption, thermal stability), and microstructural (FTIR, SEM fracture surface) properties, remains limited — particularly under the temperature and humidity conditions representative of central and northern Indian operating environments. This study fabricates and characterises hand-layup jute/epoxy, sisal/epoxy, and hybrid jute-sisal/epoxy laminated composites at fibre volume fractions of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 vol%. Alkali (NaOH) treatment at 5% and 10% concentrations, silane coupling agent treatment, and benzoyl peroxide chemical treatment are evaluated for their effect on fibre-matrix interfacial adhesion quantified through interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) and compared against untreated controls. Water absorption kinetics, thermogravimetric analysis up to 600°C, and FTIR spectroscopy on treated and untreated fibres complete the characterisation matrix. Results confirm that the hybrid 20 vol% composite with 10% NaOH-treated fibres achieves peak tensile strength of 86 MPa (105% improvement over neat epoxy), flexural strength of 118 MPa (103% improvement), and Charpy impact energy of 14.6 J — the highest values among all compositions tested. Alkali treatment at 10% NaOH concentration removes hemicellulose and surface wax, confirmed by FTIR, improving ILSS by 75% relative to untreated hybrid laminate.

Keywords:

natural fibre composites, jute, sisal, hybrid laminate, epoxy, alkali treatment, fibre volume fraction, water absorption, ILSS, TGA, FTIR, hand layup

Reference:

• [1] Bledzki, A. K., & Gassan, J. (1999). Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Progress in Polymer Science, 24(2), 221–274.

• [2] Chandramohan, D., & Marimuthu, K. (2011). A review on natural fibers. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Sciences, 8(2), 194–206.

• [3] Faruk, O., et al. (2012). Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Progress in Polymer Science, 37(11), 1552–1596.

• [4] Gowda, T. M., Naidu, A. C. B., & Chhaya, R. (1999). Some mechanical properties of untreated jute fabric-reinforced polyester composites. Composites Part A, 30(3), 277–284.

• [5] Gupta, M. K., & Srivastava, R. K. (2016). Mechanical properties of hybrid fibers-reinforced polymer composite. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, 55(6), 626–642.

• [6] Islam, M. S., et al. (2010). Effect of chemical treatment on the mechanical properties of jute fibre reinforced polymer composite. Journal of Materials Science, 45(20), 5546–5553.

• [7] Jawaid, M., & Abdul Khalil, H. P. S. (2011). Cellulosic/synthetic fibre reinforced polymer hybrid composites. Carbohydrate Polymers, 86(1), 1–18.

• [8] John, M. J., & Thomas, S. (2008). Biofibres and biocomposites. Carbohydrate Polymers, 71(3), 343–364.

• [9] Kalia, S., Kaith, B. S., & Kaur, I. (2009). Pretreatments of natural fibers and their application as reinforcing material in polymer composites. Polymer Engineering & Science, 49(7), 1253–1272.

• [10] Kumar, A., Singh, H., & Sharma, S. K. (2020). Mechanical behaviour of hybrid jute-sisal epoxy composites. Materials Today: Proceedings, 25(Part 4), 898–904.

• [11] Mishra, S., et al. (2003). Studies on mechanical performance of biofibre/glass reinforced polyester hybrid composites. Composites Science and Technology, 63(10), 1377–1385.

• [12] Mohanty, A. K., Misra, M., & Drzal, L. T. (2001). Surface modifications of natural fibers and performance of the resulting biocomposites. Composite Interfaces, 8(5), 313–343.

• [13] Rao, K. M. M., & Rao, K. M. (2007). Extraction and tensile properties of natural fibers: Vakka, date and bamboo. Composite Structures, 77(3), 288–295.

• [14] Rout, J., et al. (2001). The influence of fibre treatment on the performance of coir-polyester composites. Composites Science and Technology, 61(9), 1303–1310.

• [15] Saheb, D. N., & Jog, J. P. (1999). Natural fiber polymer composites: A review. Advances in Polymer Technology, 18(4), 351–363.

• [16] Srinivasan, V. S., et al. (2014). Mechanical properties of ceiba pentandra, jute and glass fibre reinforced hybrid composites. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 28(11), 4449–4456.

• [17] Thwe, M. M., & Liao, K. (2002). Effects of environmental aging on the mechanical properties of bamboo-glass fiber reinforced polymer matrix hybrid composites. Composites Part A, 33(1), 43–52.

• [18] Verma, C. S., & Chariar, V. M. (2012). Development of layered laminate bamboo composite and their mechanical properties. Composites Part B, 43(3), 1063–1069.

• [19] Wambua, P., Ivens, J., & Verpoest, I. (2003). Natural fibres: Can they replace glass in fibre reinforced plastics? Composites Science and Technology, 63(9), 1259–1264.

• [20] Yousif, B. F., et al. (2012). Flexural properties of treated and untreated kenaf/epoxy composites. Materials and Design, 40, 378–385.