Machine Learning-Based Predictive Maintenance Framework for Rotating Equipment in Process Industries
Author(s): Dr. K. Sujatha
Affiliation: Independent Researcher
Page No: 33-39-
Volume issue & Publishing Year: Volume 3, Issue 2, Feb 2026
Journal: International Journal of Modern Engineering and Management | IJMEM
ISSN NO: 3048-8230
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20051570
Abstract:
Predictive maintenance (PdM) has emerged as a paradigm-shifting approach to asset lifecycle management in process industries, promising significant reductions in unplanned downtime, maintenance costs, and safety-related incidents relative to conventional schedule-based and condition-based strategies. The proliferation of industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) sensors, edge computing platforms, and cloud-based data pipelines has made large-scale vibration, temperature, acoustic emission, and operational parameter data routinely available for machine learning (ML) model development. However, translating raw time-series sensor data into actionable fault prognostics remains a non-trivial engineering challenge, encompassing signal preprocessing, feature extraction in time, frequency, and time-frequency domains, class imbalance handling, cross-machine generalisation, and operational deployment under real-time latency constraints. This study presents a comprehensive ML-based predictive maintenance framework evaluated on rotating equipment — specifically centrifugal pumps, induction motors, and gearboxes — instrumented with triaxial accelerometers, thermocouples, and current sensors across three process plant sites in Northern India. Five ML algorithms are benchmarked: Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, and a proposed hybrid CNN-LSTM architecture. Feature importance analysis using SHAP values identifies the ten most predictive features across fault types. A cost-benefit model quantifies maintenance savings relative to a baseline reactive maintenance regime. The CNN-LSTM hybrid achieves the highest macro-F1 score of 0.923 across seven fault classes — including bearing inner/outer race faults, impeller cavitation, rotor imbalance, and gear tooth spalling — outperforming standalone LSTM (0.891) and Random Forest (0.874). SHAP analysis reveals that RMS acceleration in the 1-3× running speed band, kurtosis of the envelope spectrum, and thermal gradient rate are the three dominant predictive features across all equipment types. Deployment on an edge computing node (Raspberry Pi 4 with NVIDIA Jetson inference) achieves inference latency of 47 ms per prediction cycle — within the 100 ms real-time threshold required by the plant SCADA system. The cost-benefit model projects annual savings of ₹18.6 lakhs per monitored asset, yielding payback period of 14 months on sensor and software investment.
Keywords:
predictive maintenance, machine learning, rotating machinery, CNN-LSTM, vibration analysis, SHAP, IIoT, fault detection, Random Forest, SCADA
Reference:
[1] Agrawal, P., & Mishra, A. (2020). Machine learning approaches for industrial fault detection: A review. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 13(7), 1412-1428.
[2] Ali, J. B., Fnaiech, N., Saidi, L., Chebel-Morello, B., & Fnaiech, F. (2015). Application of empirical mode decomposition and artificial neural network for automatic bearing fault diagnosis based on vibration signals. Applied Acoustics, 89, 16-27.
[3] Baydar, N., & Ball, A. (2003). Detection of gear failures via vibration and acoustic signals using wavelet transform. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 17(4), 787-804.
[4] Dutta, S., & Bora, P. K. (2021). Vibration-based fault diagnosis of rotating machinery using machine learning: A review of field-deployed systems. Measurement, 178, 109384.
[5] Feng, Z., Liang, M., & Chu, F. (2013). Recent advances in time–frequency analysis methods for machinery fault diagnosis: A review with application examples. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 38(1), 165-205.
[6] Goswami, M., & Phukan, B. (2022). Condition monitoring of centrifugal pumps in paper mills using MCSA and vibration fusion. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 28(3), 541-558.
[7] Lei, Y., Yang, B., Jiang, X., Jia, F., Li, N., & Nandi, A. K. (2020). Applications of machine learning to machine fault diagnosis: A review and roadmap. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 138, 106587.
[8] Li, X., Zhang, W., Ding, Q., & Sun, J. Q. (2020). Intelligent rotating machinery fault diagnosis based on deep learning using data augmentation. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31(2), 433-452.
[9] Lu, C., Wang, Z. Y., Qin, W. L., & Ma, J. (2017). Fault diagnosis of rotary machinery components using a stacked denoising autoencoder-based health state identification. Signal Processing, 130, 377-388.
[10] Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4765-4774.
[11] Pandey, R. K., & Tiwari, A. (2021). Remaining useful life prediction of rotating machinery using ensemble learning and time-series features. Proceedings of the National Conference on Industrial Automation and Robotics (NCIAR), IIT Roorkee, 112-119.
[12] Randall, R. B., & Antoni, J. (2011). Rolling element bearing diagnostics — A tutorial. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 25(2), 485-520.
[13] Saxena, A., Goebel, K., Simon, D., & Eklund, N. (2008). Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-to-failure simulation. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (PHM), Denver, CO, 1-9.
[14] Thakur, S. D., & Sharma, V. (2022). Deep learning frameworks for predictive maintenance in process industries: Comparative evaluation. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 119(5), 3241-3258.
[15] Vachtsevanos, G., Lewis, F., Roemer, M., Hess, A., & Wu, B. (2006). Intelligent Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis for Engineering Systems. Wiley-Interscience.
[16] Wang, J., Li, C., Han, S., Sarkar, S., & Zhou, X. (2017). Predictive time-series modeling using artificial neural networks for linac beam symmetry: Before and after implementation of a predictive model. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1387(1), 84-94.
[17] Zhao, R., Yan, R., Chen, Z., Mao, K., Wang, P., & Gao, R. X. (2019). Deep learning and its applications to machine health monitoring. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 115, 213-237.