Agricultural Value Chain Transformation, Farmer Income Enhancement and the Role of e-NAM, FPOs and Contract Farming in Rural India
Author(s): Gopal Krishnaswamy, Ramesh Reddy
Affiliation: Department of Agricultural Economics, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India Department of Agribusiness Management, National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Page No: 32-34-
Volume issue & Publishing Year: Volume 3, Issue 4, 2026/04/14
Journal: International Journal of Modern Engineering and Management | IJMEM
ISSN NO: 3048-8230
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19763869
Abstract:
Indian agriculture's structural challenge — 86% of farmers are smallholders with average landholding below 1.1 hectares, operating in fragmented markets with high intermediation costs and limited price information — has persisted for decades despite numerous policy interventions. The price wedge between farm gate and consumer retail prices averages 3.2× for cereals and 5.8× for perishables in India, compared to 1.6-2.4× in comparable middle-income countries, implying that half or more of agricultural supply chain value is captured by intermediaries rather than flowing to producers or consumers. Three policy innovations since 2016 — the e-NAM electronic trading platform, Farmer Producer Organisations (FPOs), and the contract farming framework — represent the most systematic attempt to reform agricultural marketing since the APMC Acts of the 1960s. This study evaluates the impact of e-NAM, FPO membership, and contract farming on farmer income across 2,840 farm households in six states using a quasi-experimental design. e-NAM adoption increases farmer price realisation by 8.4% (p<0.001); FPO membership increases income by 24.6% (p<0.001) through collective bargaining and direct market linkage; contract farming increases income by 48.2% with higher income variability. Combined FPO+e-NAM achieves +34.8% income improvement. The IFPRI collaboration contributes the Agricultural Value Chain Impact Assessment methodology and comparative data from sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia smallholder marketing reforms.
Keywords:
agricultural value chain, e-NAM, FPO, farmer income, contract farming, APMC, India, smallholder, market reform, price discovery, MSP, rural marketing
Reference:
[1] Krishnaswamy, G., & Reddy, R. (2023). e-NAM and agricultural market efficiency in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 58(12), 44-52.
[2] NABARD. (2024). Status of Farmer Producer Organisations 2023-24. National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development.
[3] Spielman, D., et al. (2021). Agricultural market reform and smallholder income in developing countries. World Development, 138, 105261.
[4] World Bank. (2023). Agri-Food Value Chains in South Asia. World Bank Group, Washington DC.
[5] NITI Aayog. (2023). Agricultural Marketing Reforms in India. Government of India.