Mon–Fri 10:00–17:00 IST
IJMEM Logo
International Journal of Modern Engineering and Management | IJMEM
Multidisciplinary
Open Access Journal
ISSN No: 3048-8230
Follows UGC–CARE Guidelines
Home Scope Indexing Publication Charges Archives Editorial Board Downloads Contact Us

Mandatory Board Gender Diversity, Women's Leadership Pipeline and Firm Performance

Author(s):

Dr. Ananya Krishnaswami, Meera Venkatesh

Affiliation: Department of Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources, XLRI Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India Abstract

Page No: 8-10-

Volume issue & Publishing Year: Volume 3, Issue 4, 2026/04/05

Journal: International Journal of Modern Engineering and Management | IJMEM

ISSN NO: 3048-8230

DOI:

Abstract:

SEBI's 2014 mandate requiring at least one woman director on the board of every listed company — subsequently strengthened to two independent women directors for top 500 listed entities by market capitalisation (SEBI circular 2018) — created a quasi-experimental setting for examining the causal effects of board gender diversity on firm performance and leadership pipeline development in India. The pre-mandate baseline (2013 census: 4.8% women on BSE 500 boards) and the post-mandate trajectory (2024: 19.6% women on boards) enable regression discontinuity design analysis of the mandate's effects that avoids the self-selection bias afflicting voluntary diversity studies. This study analyses a panel of 486 BSE-listed companies from 2012-2024, examining the causal effect of board gender diversity on Tobin's Q, ROA, ROE, and sustainability reporting quality, using regression discontinuity design at the mandate implementation threshold and instrumental variable estimation using the SEBI mandate as an instrument for board diversity. The study also examines the pipeline paradox — whether mandatory board appointments have accelerated or been disconnected from the development of women in senior management positions — through analysis of C-suite gender data from annual reports. The findings confirm positive diversity-performance effects (Tobin's Q premium of 0.24 for highest diversity quartile versus lowest), but reveal a persistent board-executive gap (board women: 19.6% versus C-suite women: 12.4%) and significant sector heterogeneity in both representation and performance impact.

Keywords:

board gender diversity, SEBI mandate, firm performance, Tobin's Q, women directors, pipeline paradox, India, regression discontinuity, ROA, ROE, corporate governance

Reference:

  • [1] Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309.

  • [2] Krishnaswami, A., & Venkatesh, M. (2023). Mandatory diversity and firm performance in India. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 31(4), 484-506.

  • [3] Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The External Control of Organizations. Harper & Row.

  • [4] Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2010). The importance of role models and demographic context for senior women's work identity development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(3), 284-300.

  • [5] SEBI. (2023). Annual Report 2022-23. Securities and Exchange Board of India.

  • [6] Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320-337.

Download PDF