Employee Engagement Strategies in the Post-Pandemic Era
Author(s): Anitha R.¹, Manoj Kumar², Priya Singh³, Rohan Das?
Affiliation: ���? Department of Management Studies, Sai Venkateshwara Institute of Management and Technology, Hyderabad, India
Page No: 13-17-
Volume issue & Publishing Year: Volume 2 Issue 9 ,Sep -2025
Journal: International Journal of Modern Engineering and Management | IJMEM
ISSN NO: 3048-8230
DOI:
Abstract:
The COVID-19 pandemic reshaped workplaces worldwide, forcing organizations to reimagine employee engagement strategies. Remote and hybrid work models, digital collaboration tools, and heightened concerns about well-being have shifted the traditional dynamics of organizational culture. This study explores employee engagement in the post-pandemic era, focusing on digital communication, work–life balance, wellness programs, leadership practices, and employee voice mechanisms. Drawing upon secondary data, case studies, and conceptual analysis, the paper identifies emerging practices such as virtual engagement platforms, mental health initiatives, flexible scheduling, and inclusive leadership as crucial to sustaining workforce motivation. The findings suggest that organizations adopting holistic engagement strategies that combine technology with empathy are better positioned to thrive in the volatile post-pandemic environment.
Keywords:
Employee Engagement, Post-Pandemic Workplace, Remote Work, Leadership, Well-being, Hybrid Models
Reference:
[1] W. A. Kahn, “Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 692–724, 1990.
[2] W. B. Schaufeli, “What is engagement?” in Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice, C. Truss, R. Delbridge, K. Alfes, A. Shantz, and E. Soane, Eds. Routledge, 2013, pp. 15–35.
[3] A. M. Saks, “Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement,” Journal of Managerial Psychology, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 600–619, 2006.
[4] C. Maslach and M. P. Leiter, “Understanding burnout and engagement: Issues in theory and practice,” World Psychiatry, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 103–111, 2016.
[5] A. B. Bakker and E. Demerouti, “Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward,” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 273–285, 2017.
[6] C. Bailey, A. Madden, K. Alfes, and L. Fletcher, “The meaning, antecedents and outcomes of employee engagement: A narrative synthesis,” International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 31–53, 2017.
[7] A. B. Bakker and S. L. Albrecht, “Work engagement: Current trends,” Career Development International, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 4–11, 2018.
[8] Gallup, State of the Global Workplace Report 2021. Washington, D.C.: Gallup Research, 2021.
[9] Deloitte, Global Human Capital Trends: The Social Enterprise at Work. London: Deloitte Insights, 2020.
[10] Gartner, Redefining Employee Engagement in a Hybrid World. Stamford: Gartner Research, 2021.
[11] Aon Hewitt, Trends in Employee Engagement in Asia Pacific. Singapore: Aon Research Report, 2021.
[12] Towers Watson, Employee Engagement during COVID-19: Navigating the New Normal. London: Willis Towers Watson, 2020.
[13] T. Manoharan and M. Singal, “Employee engagement in India: Lessons from the pandemic,” South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 123–138, 2021.
[14] R. Kumar and S. Sharma, “Hybrid work models and employee engagement in Indian IT firms,” Journal of Organizational Behavior Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 44–58, 2022.