Decentralized Autonomous Organization Governance Mechanisms and Traditional Corporate Management Structure Adaptation Tendencies

Author(s): Tomás Vega-Ibáñez, Stefan Baumgartner, Yuki Tanaka

Affiliation: Faculty of Law and Digital Governance, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana

Page No: 43-50

Volume issue & Publishing Year: Volume 3, Issue 7, 2026/07/06

Journal: International Journal of Modern Engineering and Management | IJMEM

ISSN NO: 3048-8230

Download PDF Cite this article

Abstract:

This study examines Web3 governance models and their gradual adoption by conventional technology companies, with a focus on comparative operational dynamics and regulatory friction. Employing a mixed-methods design spanning 62 organisations across four continents over a 24-month observation period, the research measures the policy implementation speed of voting-based decentralized autonomous organisation (DAO) governance structures against traditional top-down executive decision-making. Findings reveal that DAO mechanisms outperform executive hierarchies in only two of seven policy domains — protocol upgrades and fee structure changes — while exhibiting significantly longer implementation cycles for personnel decisions, compliance responses, and strategic pivots (grand mean: 21.4 days for DAOs vs. 12.5 days for traditional governance). Simultaneously, DAOs demonstrate substantially superior stakeholder inclusion and transparency scores. Legal and regulatory compliance analysis across five domains — securities law, tax compliance, AML/KYC, data privacy, and labour regulation — reveals compliance gaps of 17–72 percentage points between traditional and DAO structures, with labour regulation presenting the most acute deficiency. Structural equation modelling indicates that hybrid governance models — incorporating community ratification of strategic decisions within traditional executive infrastructure — achieve the most favourable balance of implementation speed, compliance readiness, and stakeholder satisfaction

Keywords:

decentralized autonomous organisations, DAO governance, Web3, corporate management, token voting, regulatory compliance, decision-making speed, hybrid governance, blockchain, organisational adaptation

Reference:

• [1] Barberá, P., Boydstun, A., Linn, S., McMahon, R., & Nagler, J. (2021). Automated text classification of news articles: A practical guide. Political Analysis, 29(1), 19–42.

• [2] Brown, L. D., & Caylor, M. L. (2006). Corporate governance and firm valuation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(4), 409–434.

• [3] Buterin, V. (2014). A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. Ethereum White Paper. Retrieved from https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/

• [4] Chohan, U. W. (2017). The decentralized autonomous organization and governance issues. SSRN Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3082055

• [5] De Filippi, P., & Wright, A. (2018). Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code. Harvard University Press.

• [6] Fisch, J. E., & Morley, J. D. (2021). The future of DAO governance: Toward a theory of on-chain corporate law. Stanford Technology Law Review, 24(2), 198–248.

• [7] Hassan, S., & De Filippi, P. (2021). Decentralized autonomous organization. Internet Policy Review, 10(2), 1–10.

• [8] Jentzsch, C. (2016). Decentralized autonomous organization to automate governance. White Paper, Slock.it. Retrieved from https://lawofthelevel.lexblogplatformthree.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/187/2017/07/WhitePaper-1.pdf

• [9] Lalley, S., & Weyl, E. G. (2018). Quadratic voting: How mechanism design can radicalize democracy. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, 108, 33–37.

• [10] Ooi, T. H., & Lim, K. (2022). Legal personality for decentralized autonomous organizations: A comparative analysis. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 22(1), 89–128.

• [11] Reijers, W., Healy, G., Barry, C., & Ioini, N. E. (2021). Governing decentralized autonomous organizations. Journal of Organisation Design, 10(3), 1–23.

• [12] Voshmgir, S. (2020). Token Economy: How the Web3 Reinvents the Internet (2nd ed.). BlockchainHub Berlin.

• [13] Wackerow, P., & Ernst, C. (2023). DAO governance maturity framework: A multi-case benchmarking study. Distributed Ledger Technology: Research and Practice, 2(3), 1–19.